Get awesome blog templates like this one from BlogSkins.com
:Random thoughts from a Renegade Mom:

Saturday, October 15, 2005

WORKING MOTHERS MAKE KIDS FAT 

The issues surrounding being a mother are complicated and getting more complicated everyday! It starts as soon as birth:
natural childbirth vs. epideral. Breastfeeding vs. bottle feeding. Co-sleeping vs. crib. Cry-it-out vs. going in. Public School Vs. Private School vs. Home school. and the big one: Stay at home Vs. Work.

These are just a fraction of the issues. Every choice you make lables you as a good/bad mother in the views of other people. Now we have another reason to feel bad about our selves.

Anne-Marie from A Mama's Rant reported back in august about a study linking working mothers and obesity.
Whether you blame school vending machines, fast food, or too much TV, American kids have never been fatter. Now, Wellesley College professor Phil Levine has found a link between working mothers and childhood obesity. One finding in his study was particularly surprising.

"That effect tends to be concentrated among upper income women," he said.

But by upper income, we're not talking about the country club set. The study is referring to families with a total household income around $80,000.

Professor Levine believes working moms are so strapped for time they may be forced to take unhealthy shortcuts like swinging through a drive-thru for dinner.
Well, I can say that the thought of working increases my stress level when I think of dinner and bedtimes. I can really see alot of drive-thrus and dinner in a box.

Gina froze in time on 9:18 PM [ | ]

Friday, October 14, 2005

President Bush's approval ratings are in a steep decline 




President Bush is seeing his number go from bad to worse, according to a new poll by the Pew Research Center.

The survey found that only 38 percent of Americans think the president is doing a good job, down from 50 percent in January. And most surprisingly (well to some) is for the first time since he took office most people think he will be judged as an unsuccessful president

'That's a pretty bleak assessment,' said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center. 'The numbers for President Bush are really going from bad to worse.' In September, a Pew poll found that Bush's approval rating dropped as a response to what was considered to be a poor handling of the relief effort for Hurricane Katrina's victims. The latest Pew poll, a national survey of 1,500 adults conducted Oct. 6 to Oct. 10, shows that his numbers are continuing to slip.

And it's not just the "left wing conspiracy", his numbers are even starting to slip among his loyal Republican base. In his base his numbers are still very high, 80 percent approval, but this is down from 90 percent from earlier this year. Interestingly enough, in his Republican base, only 62 percent, that he will go down in history as a successful president.

Gina froze in time on 12:28 PM [ | ]

Thursday, October 13, 2005


dawn


Which Sexy Comic Book Woman Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla


Funny that I should come up with this one.....

Gina froze in time on 9:18 PM [ | ]

Pagan veteran wants pentacle symbol on his grave 


Again it seems like despite the fact that millions of Americans identify them selves as pagan, the pagan does not get the same respect as other "main stream" religions.

A Pagan veteran wants a pentacle, the "cross" of the pagan relegion to be on his grave stone when he dies. A simple request you might think, but not so when it comes to our government

"But the Defense Department doesn't allow the pentacle -- a five-pointed star in a circle -- on markers in national cemeteries.

The Defense Department recognized Wiccans in 1996 but the National Cemetery Association of the Veterans Affairs Department hasn't authorized the symbol. "

Gina froze in time on 7:15 PM [ | ]

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Motherhood - it's probably just another word for being bonkers 

Ask any mother, and she'll most likely tell you she's a short drive to looney-ville and according to a new study, she may be right. A psychiatrist at Yale University has found surprising similarities between OCD sufferers and first time parents.

Now he is speculating that OCD occurs when the brain circuits associated with parenting are triggered in the absence of a baby.

Professor James Leckman started researching OCD in the 1980s. His plan was to hunt down the neurotransmitter that might hold the key to OCD, in the same way that the neurotransmitter serotonin plays a role in depression. He did chemical analyses of the cerebrospinal fluid from OCD sufferers and found . . . nothing.

Rather than leave the samples languishing in the freezer, Leckman sent them off to another researcher to check for less well-known chemicals. “The guy who examined them was amazed by the levels of oxytocin,” Leckman says. Oxytocin is the hormone that tightens the parent-child bond. Knock out the oxytocin gene in female mice, and they lose the ability to nurse their young. Inject oxytocin into animals, and they show grooming behaviour and an increased faithfulness to one mate."

Leckman suggests that, given the high rates of infant mortality during human evolution, parents whose brains contained the neurocircuitry of paranoia would be most successful at keeping their offspring alive. When these circuits are switched on at the wrong time, he theorises, the obsessive behaviours become problematic and result in OCD. In particular, two variants of OCD - compulsive checking to ensure no harm comes to one’s family and an inordinate desire for cleanliness - are familiar to new parents.
Recently he has interviewed new parents and found that just before and just after the birth the feelings and fears of both mothers and fathers are strikingly reminiscent of those voiced by OCD sufferers.

Looks like the drive just got a little shorter.

Gina froze in time on 10:04 AM [ | ]

Monday, October 10, 2005

Gore condemns Modern media coverage 

Gore gave an excellent speech on the nature of modern public discourse and the critical role it played not only in the formation of our country, but in understanding out basic freedoms.

"I thought maybe it was an aberration when three-quarters of Americans said they believed that Saddam Hussein was responsible for attacking us on September 11, 2001. But more than four years later, between a third and a half still believe Saddam was personally responsible for planning and supporting the attack.

At first I thought the exhaustive, non-stop coverage of the O.J. trial was just an unfortunate excess that marked an unwelcome departure from the normal good sense and judgment of our television news media. But now we know that it was merely an early example of a new pattern of serial obsessions that periodically take over the airwaves for weeks at a time."

"But some extremely important elements of American Democracy have been pushed to the sidelines . And the most prominent casualty has been the "marketplace of ideas" that was so beloved and so carefully protected by our Founders. It effectively no longer exists.

It is not that we no longer share ideas with one another about public matters; of course we do. But the "Public Forum" in which our Founders searched for general agreement and applied the Rule of Reason has been grossly distorted and "restructured" beyond all recognition.

And here is my point: it is the destruction of that marketplace of ideas that accounts for the "strangeness" that now continually haunts our efforts to reason together about the choices we must make as a nation.



During the speech Gore did plug his new cable network, Current TV. Current is trying to foster greater viewer/broadcaster interaction with live events and viewer-produced programming.

I don't think Gore's new cable network, Current TV, is the answer, It really was a great speech.

And now we know what Gore has been doing since the 2000 election.
Who knew he had been off reading Habermas?

On a lighter note, if you have not heard this song AL Gore By Monkey Bowl, you really need to listen. Al Gore actually makes his "singing" debut on this album! You need to listen to the whole song, wait for it......

To read the speech:

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/10/06/D8D2IU703.html


Gina froze in time on 1:02 PM [ | ]

Sunday, October 09, 2005

Science of the brain 


University of Chicago researchers find human brain still evolving:

"Our studies indicate that the trend that is the defining characteristic of human evolution - the growth of brain size and complexity - is likely still going on,' said lead researcher for both papers Bruce Lahn, PhD, assistant professor of human genetics at the University of Chicago and an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. 'Meanwhile, our environment and the skills we need to survive in it are changing faster then we ever imagined. I would expect the human brain, which has done well by us so far, will continue to adapt to those changes."

So does this mean we may some day be like Cone head? Maybe we will all have psychic powers in the future! It reminds me of the book Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clarke, aliens come to earth to help with our "next evolutionary step, and join the great "collective".

Stem Cells may help Repaire Spinal Cord Injuries:

Researchers at the UC Irvine Reeve-Irvine Research Center have used adult human neural stem cells to successfully regenerate damaged spinal cord tissue and improve mobility in mice.
The findings point to the promise of using this type of cells for possible therapies to help humans who have spinal cord injuries. Study results appear online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Early Edition.

"We set out to find whether these cells would be able to respond to the injury in an appropriate and beneficial way on their own," Cummings said. "We were excited to find that the cells responded to the damage by making appropriate new cells that could assist in repair. This study supports the possibility that formation of new myelin and new neurons may contribute to recovery."

Mice that received human neural stem cells nine days after spinal cord injury showed improvements in walking ability compared to mice that received either no cells or a control transplant of human fibroblast cells (which cannot differentiate into nervous system cells). Further experiments showed behavioral improvements after either moderate or more severe injuries, with the treated mice being able to step using the hind paws and coordinate stepping between paws whereas control mice were uncoordinated.

The cells were transplanted into the mice and they had improved mobility, but when the cells (the human cells) were destroyed the mice were unable to walk again, leading the researchers to believe that the transplanted cells made the "bridge" over the damaged area.

The research has only be successful on injures that are "new", older injuries do not improve with the cell transplant.


First Evidence Of Brain Abnormalities Found In Pathological Liars

A University of Southern California study has found the first proof of structural brain abnormalities in people who habitually lie, cheat and manipulate others.

The liars had significantly more "white matter" and slightly less "gray matter" than those they were measured against, Raine said.

Specifically, liars had a 25.7 percent increase in prefrontal white matter compared to the antisocial controls and a 22 percent increase compared to the normal controls. Liars had a 14.2 percent decrease in prefrontal gray matter compared to normal controls.

More white matter - the wiring in the brain - may provide liars with the tools necessary to master the complex art of deceit, Raine said.

"Lying takes a lot of effort," he said.

"Our argument is that the more networking there is in the prefrontal cortex, the more the person has an upper hand in lying. Their verbal skills are higher. They've almost got a natural advantage."

But in normal people, it's the gray matter - or the brain cells connected by the white matter - that helps keep the impulse to lie in check.


It's not my fault my brain made me do it!!! This could well be a new defense in court. "your honor, my client could not help but take millions from the retirement accounts of these poor honest seniors, he has too much white matter!"

Gina froze in time on 10:38 AM [ | ]

Single mom's, marriage not in the forecast 


Women who have children out of wedlock are about 30 percent less likely to get married than childless single women, according to a new study.

When unwed mothers do marry, they are more likely to land husbands who are significantly older and less educated, bigger losers, than those of women who don't have children.

"It's more difficult for unwed mothers to get married, and if they do, they tend to not marry well," said Zhenchao Qian, associate professor of sociology at Ohio State University.

More than a third of female-headed families with children live in poverty compared to only 6 percent of married couples with children, Qian said. Marriage may not help unwed mothers economically, however, because their partners tend to lack education and are less likely to have opportunities for good-paying jobs.


Both of my sisters had children out of wedlock. My older sister has never been married and the men she has dated have been big looser!

My younger sister ended up marrying her "babies daddy" and it has been a disaster for them. They were young when they had Nick (she's two years younger then me and Nick is four years older than Mikal, you can figure out the rest). Her husband did not get any other training or education after he finished high school, she atleast went to a trade school so she could be a Physician's assistant. They are now getting a divorce, after he violated his parole, drug related.

So, I'd have to agree with this study.

Gina froze in time on 8:26 AM [ | ]


Listed on BlogShares

Technorati search



designed by: dreamwalker